Selected work

Clinical workflows Selected work

Give clinicians their focus back.

Source-informed AI assistance for clinical documentation, structured quality checks, and everyday clinical workflows.

Work represented

Built for a top 5 ABA provider nationally

Disciplines

  • Applied AI
  • Clinical workflow design
  • Document intelligence
  • Evaluation engineering

Inside the interface

Existing demonstration · sample client

Existing sample-client clinical demonstration with a Vision Report source link, original and suggested text, and clinician review controls

Clinical Assistant · Source to suggestion

Existing demonstration workspace with a sample client. Source review and the acceptance decision remain with the clinician.

Open original (new tab)

Reading the screen

What can a clinician inspect before accepting a suggestion?

A clinician compares the proposed wording with its source and makes the acceptance decision.

Read the decision points
  1. Source context stays visible beside the proposed change.
  2. Original and suggested wording can be compared before taking action.
  3. The reviewer can accept or dismiss a suggestion; a generated draft is not clinical approval.
The workflow pattern
  1. Source context
  2. Draft & checks
  3. Clinician review

Put intelligence inside the workflow

Clinical teams work across records, transcripts, forms, and documentation requirements. The opportunity for AI extends beyond generating a paragraph. It starts with preparing the right context and ends with a useful result that a clinician can review in the flow of their work.

We build that complete experience: data preparation, grounded drafting, structured checks, and in-application assistance.

Context first. Useful output next.

Source-informed drafting. Clinical information is gathered and prepared before a writing workflow runs. Structured outputs give the next step a consistent starting point, rather than leaving every clinician to assemble the same context manually.

Writer and checker workflows. Dedicated stages separate drafting from evaluation. Structured checks surface review flags and preserve the information teams need to examine an output.

Assistance in existing tools. Browser-based workflows connect relevant records, transcripts, documents, and form context to the task at hand. Teams get support where the work already happens.

Quality as part of the product

Documentation tools combine deterministic checks with AI-assisted content review. Evaluation is built around meaningful examples and the specific task. Clinical review remains an explicit part of the experience, with source context and review flags available to support the final decision.

What this makes possible

  • Less time assembling context and preparing a first draft.
  • More consistent structure across documentation workflows.
  • Clearer review signals and fewer disconnected tools.
  • More time and attention available for the work of care.
All selected work

Start with a focused build

Explore clinical workflows with Jay.

Talk with Jay
Talk with Jay